Non-polymer PFAS can build up in blood protein of animals, and is not always removed quickly. This means that predators eating PFAS-contaminated food will have higher levels in their bloodstream, and concentrations can increase up the food chain. Studies suggest that build up of PFAS is similar to those of other Persistent Organic Pollutants such as DDT.PFAS are estimated to be settling in arctic regions at rates of tens to hundreds of kilograms per year (25-850kg per year), depending on the specific PFAS chemical in question. Certain PFAS are released as gases to the environment and are blown a long way by wind and air currents in the atmosphere,. These gas PFAS will over time degrade to more persistent chemicals like PFOS and PFOA. This may be one reason why PFAS of environmental concern have been found in remote regions such as the Arctic as well as near PFAS production sitesPFAS including PFOS and PFOA have been found in air samples around Europe. The chemicals are found in small quantities, but appear in almost all samples tested. PFAS enters the atmosphere both from factories and the air inside our homes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17554424 PFAS is found in treated waste water from industrial and domestic sources and has been found in both rivers and groundwater. Conventional drinking water processes will not remove PFAS.PFAS-coated clothes that are thrown away will often end up either incinerated or in landfill. Unless incinerated at very high temperatures (>1000oC), fluorinated polymers could release more harmful PFAS during burning. PFAS of environmental concern have also been found in landfill leachate. Non-polymer PFAS are used in the production of fluorinated polymers. The manufacture of stain-resistant finishes generally releases these PFASs into the environment, both by air and water emissions. They are very hard to remove during water treatment. Workers in textiles factories are some of the population most exposed to these potentially harmful chemicals. Small quantities of PFAS will be removed during wash and wear of products containing PFAS. This includes fluorinated polymers used on stain-resistant coatings, and non-polymers that remain on clothes after production (Lassen et al. 2015).Most UK waste still ends up in landfill, and this includes PFAS-containing products. Studies have shown that the liquid coming from landfills (known as leachate) often contain non-polymer PFAS chemicals. In the USA the total quantities were estimated at 563-638 kg in 2013. To properly break down PFAS chemicals high temperature (1000oC or more) incineration is recommended. Incineration of municipal waste does not necessarily reach these temperatures (min temp. required is 850oC), and the incomplete breakdown could release non-polymer PFAS.Wash and wear of clothing that contains PFAS-based stain-resistant or water repellent finishes release PFAS to the environment. Coatings are thought to lose effectiveness after 20-30 washes. This can include non-polymer PFAS, remnant from production or as a break-down product of side-chain polymers (Lassen et al. 2015). The manufacture of stain-resistant finishes releases PFAS into the environment, both by air and water emissions. PFAS are very hard to remove during water treatment. Industrial emissions are estimated to be the biggest source of these chemicals to the environment.

TFA – the tiny but prevalent PFAS

Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a short chained PFAS that is a common breakdown product of other bigger PFAS used in products such as F-gases, fluoropolymers and pesticides[1]. The scientific community are becoming increasingly concerned about the potentially harmful properties of TFA and increasing levels in the environment, particularly in water sources[2], [3], [4], [5].  

TFA belongs to the same subgroup as PFOA, one of the most toxic and well known PFAS. TFA is the smallest molecule in this group with the shortest perfluorinated carbon chain[3] (figure 1). Scientists have identified over 2,000 substances that can break down into TFA in soils, water, and sediments through biological and light-driven processes[6]. 

TFA is a persistent substance that accumulates and lingers in the environment[7]. It is also highly mobile, allowing it to spread quickly, especially through the water cycle[5], [6]. Recent studies indicate that TFA is nearly ubiquitous, meaning it is found extensively across various environments[1], [8] 

Figure 1: TFA belongs to the same subgroup of PFAS as PFOA, one of the most toxic and well known PFAS. TFA is the smallest molecule in this group with the shortest perfluorinated carbon chain
Figure 1: TFA belongs to the same subgroup of PFAS as PFOA, one of the most toxic and well known PFAS. TFA is the smallest molecule in this group with the shortest perfluorinated carbon chain

Sources of TFA

Pesticides

PFAS pesticides are thought to be the main source of TFA water contamination in rural areas in Europe[9]. TFA can be formed from the degradation of many pesticide active substances. Currently, there are estimated to be at least 24 pesticides approved and used in the UK that have the potential to breakdown to TFA in the environment.  Flufenacet is a pesticide that has the most potential to breakdown to TFA, and was applied to 2.9 million hectares of UK arable land in 2022—an area nearly twice the size of Wales[10] 

Credit: Loren King, unsplash

Industrial sites

Industrial activities are the main sources of TFA contamination in the environment[11], [12]. Key sources include, the production of pharmaceuticals, fire-fighting chemicals, fluorinated gases(F-gases) and fluoropolymers. Of these, F-gases are the biggest concern, as they produce gaseous TFA precursors, that have significantly boosted TFA levels in the Northern Hemisphere’s atmosphere over the last 30 years[13] 

Credit: Patrick Hendry, Unsplash

Waste water treatment plants

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a significant source of TFA in the environment [4]. Wastewater often contains many TFA precursors, like pharmaceuticals[14], which can form TFA during processing. Standard treatment methods cannot remove TFA[15], so its concentration remains largely unchanged through the treatment cycle. Additionally, WWTPs dealing with high levels of industrial wastewater—such as from pharmaceutical or fluoropolymer production—may see higher TFA concentrations[4]. 

Credit: Bob Brewer, Unsplash

Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is highly soluble and mobile, which means it’s accumulating in water sources everywhere—from arctic ice[16] and groundwater to rivers, lakes, and even our drinking water. Studies sampling surface and groundwater across ten European countries, found over 98% of PFAS to be TFA [2]. Additionally, TFA has been detected in 94% of tap water samples across 11 European countries and in 63% of bottled mineral and spring waters tested [3]. This pervasive presence of TFA in both natural and drinking water sources is raising concerns about long-term environmental and health impacts. 

TFA is thought to have “low to moderate” toxicity, however, because levels are rapidly rising in the environment, there are concerns about future impacts[17]. While TFA doesn’t accumulate in human or animal tissues, it does build up in plants[18]. Additionally, human exposure is still not well understood. Studies have detected TFA in human blood, with concentrations up to 77 µg/L and animal studies suggest potential risks [19], [20]. For example, TFA exposure has been linked to birth defects in rabbits[21], and similar short chained PFAS have been shown to have toxic effects on freshwater organisms[22]. 

Recently, Germany has proposed classifying TFA as a “very Persistent very Mobile” (vPvM),  Persistent Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT), and Reprotoxic substance, indicating high environmental concern, with possible restrictions ahead in the EU[23], [24], [25]. 

Given the widespread contamination and potential environmental impact of this substance, it is essential that PFAS be restricted under a single set of overarching regulation within the UK. Doing so presents a huge opportunity to effectively reduce emissions of TFA, and wider PFAS pollution, and safeguard people and the environment. 

It is also important to highlight that many PFAS cleanup technologies are actually generating TFA as a byproduct, as they work by breaking down PFAS compounds[11]. Future remediation methods must also address this to ensure they don’t unintentionally contribute to further TFA contamination. 

References

[1]        H. P. H. Arp, A. Gredelj, J. Glüge, M. Scheringer, and I. T. Cousins, “The Global Threat from the Irreversible Accumulation of Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA),” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 58, no. 45, pp. 19925–19935, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06189.

[2]        BUND Friends of the Earth Germany et al., “TFA in Water: Dirty PFAS Legacy Under the Radar,” 2024.

[3]        PAN EU et al., “TFA The Forever Chemical in the Water We Drink Only a rapid ban on PFAS pesticides and F-gases can save our water,” 2024.

[4]        F. Freeling and M. K. Björnsdotter, “Assessing the environmental occurrence of the anthropogenic contaminant trifluoroacetic acid (TFA),” Jun. 01, 2023, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100807.

[5]        M. Scheurer et al., “Small, mobile, persistent: Trifluoroacetate in the water cycle – Overlooked sources, pathways, and consequences for drinking water supply,” Water Res, vol. 126, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.045.

[6]        G. Environment Agency, “Reducing the input of chemicals into waters: trifluoroacetate (TFA) as a persistent and mobile substance with many sources.” [Online]. Available: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/

[7]        M. de los A. Garavagno, R. Holland, M. A. H. Khan, A. J. Orr-Ewing, and D. E. Shallcross, “Trifluoroacetic Acid: Toxicity, Sources, Sinks and Future Prospects,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/su16062382.

[8]        I. T. Cousins, J. H. Johansson, M. E. Salter, B. Sha, and M. Scheringer, “Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS),” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 56, no. 16, pp. 11172–11179, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.2C02765/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/ES2C02765_0001.JPEG.

[9]        S. Sturm et al., “Trifluoroacetate (TFA): Laying the foundations for effective mitigation – Spatial analysis of the input pathways into the water cycle.”

[10]     Fidra, “PFAS active substances in UK pesticides,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.fidra.org.uk

[11]     F. Freeling and M. K. Björnsdotter, “Assessing the environmental occurrence of the anthropogenic contaminant trifluoroacetic acid (TFA),” Jun. 01, 2023, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100807.

[12]     H. P. H. Arp, A. Gredelj, J. Glüge, M. Scheringer, and I. T. Cousins, “The Global Threat from the Irreversible Accumulation of Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA),” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 58, no. 45, pp. 19925–19935, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06189.

[13]     R. Holland et al., “Investigation of the Production of Trifluoroacetic Acid from Two Halocarbons, HFC-134a and HFO-1234yf and Its Fates Using a Global Three-Dimensional Chemical Transport Model,” ACS Earth Space Chem, vol. 5, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355.

[14]     M. Inoue, Y. Sumii, and N. Shibata, “Contribution of Organofluorine Compounds to Pharmaceuticals,” ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 10633–10640, May 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00830.

[15]     J. Zhou, N. Saeidi, L. Y. Wick, Y. Xie, F. D. Kopinke, and A. Georgi, “Efficient removal of trifluoroacetic acid from water using surface-modified activated carbon and electro-assisted desorption,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 436, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129051.

[16]     W. F. Hartz et al., “Levels and distribution profiles of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in a high Arctic Svalbard ice core,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 871, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161830.

[17]     K. R. Solomon et al., “Sources, fates, toxicity, and risks of trifluoroacetic acid and its salts: Relevance to substances regulated under the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols,” 2016. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2016.1175981.

[18]     F. Freeling, M. Scheurer, J. Koschorreck, G. Hoffmann, T. A. Ternes, and K. Nödler, “Levels and Temporal Trends of Trifluoroacetate (TFA) in Archived Plants: Evidence for Increasing Emissions of Gaseous TFA Precursors over the Last Decades,” Environ Sci Technol Lett, vol. 9, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00164.

[19]     G. Zheng, S. M. Eick, and A. Salamova, “Elevated Levels of Ultrashort- and Short-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids in US Homes and People,” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 57, no. 42, pp. 15782–15793, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.2C06715/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/ES2C06715_0001.JPEG.

[20]     Y. Duan, H. Sun, Y. Yao, Y. Meng, and Y. Li, “Distribution of novel and legacy per-/polyfluoroalkyl substances in serum and its associations with two glycemic biomarkers among Chinese adult men and women with normal blood glucose levels,” Environ Int, vol. 134, p. 105295, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.105295.

[21]     ECHA, “Registration Dossier – ECHA.” Accessed: Jun. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://echa.europa.eu/fr/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/5203/7/9/3/?documentUUID=bbe1c0df-91db-4cef-a965-89ded98a88c8

[22]     Y. Wang, J. Niu, L. Zhang, and J. Shi, “Toxicity assessment of perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs) towards the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 491–492, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.028.

[23]     G. Environment Agency, “Reducing the input of chemicals into waters: trifluoroacetate (TFA) as a persistent and mobile substance with many sources.” [Online]. Available: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/

[24]     H. H. Peter Arp et al., “UBA TEXTE 22/2023 A prioritization framework for PMT/vPvM Substances under REACH for registrants, regulators, researchers and the water sector,” 2023.

[25]     ECHA, “Registry of CLH intentions until outcome -Trifluoroacetic acid.” Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://echa.europa.eu/fr/registry-of-clh-intentions-until-outcome/-/dislist/details/0b0236e188e6e587